Home   About   Connect   Bonus   Wedded Blissters   Book
RSS Twitter Facebook YouTube

Fairness Seems Fairly Unique to Humans…

Photo Credit: Creative Commons – WillSmith15

We found a way to solve that ultimate fairness conundrum between kids – how to equitably split the final piece of cake, pie or brownie between our two daughters without one of them leveling claims of inequality because the other “got the bigger piece.”

What we do is we’ll flip a coin to decide which of them will cut the last piece of dessert into two pieces. Then, regardless of who did the cutting, the other child gets to choose their preferred piece first.

As the girls have matured they talk during the “cutting process” and the “chooser” frequently takes the smaller piece for herself.

What used to be a startling escalation of allegations and counter allegations has transformed into collaboration and altruism.

This little slice of our life showcases the nearly universal human need and cry for fairness.

Even as little kids we instinctively understand that it’s not fair to budge in line, take a toy or snack that belongs to someone else or swing too long on the playground swing while other kids are waiting.

Where did this innate sense of fairness come from?

Apparently, NOT from evolution.

A fascinating study published this week in the Journal of Biology Letters found that the primates we’re most similar too genetically (chimpanzees and bonobos) have NO sense of fairness or equity when it comes to food.

A summary of the study can be found at ScienceDaily, but the bottom line is that after a series of different scenarios played out among these animals it was universally clear that the apes didn’t care if they stole food from others in their group or family.

Here’s an interesting quote from the head of the study, professor Keith Jensen, from Queen Mary’s School of Biological and Chemical Sciences:

“Our findings support other studies of chimpanzees but also extend these to bonobos. Both apes have no concern for fairness or the effects that their choices may have on others; in stark contrast to the way humans behave. We can therefore conclude that our results indicate that our sense of fairness is a derived trait and may be unique to the human race. If fairness considerations are important for cooperative activities such as trading goods and services and sharing, the question then is, when did they evolve in our species? And if fairness is important only in humans, the question is why only in humans?”

Why indeed.  This study is just one of many that show a widening gap between our innate behaviors as humans and those of animals, throwing another monkey wrench into the machinery of evolutionary belief.

Perhaps the reason fairness and considering the needs of seems uniquely human is because it’s more of an issue of our spirit than our genetics? In fact, in the Sermon on the Mount Jesus requires us to go even farther than merely being fair with someone:

You have heard that it was said, ‘Love your neighbor and hate your enemy. But I tell you: Love your enemies and pray for those who persecute you, that you may be sons of your Father in heaven. He causes his sun to rise on the evil and the good, and sends rain on the righteous and the unrighteous. If you love those who love you, what reward will you get? Are not even the tax collectors (or the wicked) doing that? (Matthew 5:43-46)

The success or failure of a society hinges on how its members treat and care for each other. While a sense of fairness is at society’s core we as humans are ultimately called to more.

 Question: Do you have a personal story about the importance of “fairness”?

  • Roy A. Ackerman, PhD, EA

    What a contrast to the NIMBY that is really practiced… or the devolution of the safety net that has helped many a soul from falling through the cracks!

    • http://www.thedailyretort.com/ TorConstantino

      Great addendum to the post Roy – well said!

  • http://twitter.com/FilmCriticOne Mark DC

    By the way, regarding sharing food. I came upon this truth when my kids were little. If I had just one candy bar, say, for two to share, there were endless arguments over who got the bigger piece, if it was not easily divided., One child would separate it into halves, and no matter how uneven the division, the person who took the biggest half insisted ad nauseum they were even, no matter if it was 80% -20%.

    But if you let one cut the candy bar in half, and the other chose which half he got, you would be stunned to see how precise those cuts could be. Your local math wizard could not cut that candy bar in half any more perfectly.

    The moral of the story is, selfishness is justified with passion and conviction, and absolute sincerity.

    • http://www.thedailyretort.com/ TorConstantino

      Thanks for the comment Mark – regarding your candy bar point, I made the same observation in the first few paragraphs of this blog post. Thanks.

  • http://www.ramblingbarba.com Ken Hagerman

    Great observations, Tor. As far as the cake goes, I just eat it and the kids never know there was an extra piece.

    My family has experienced/are experiencing a shift in our collective sensitivity to fairness. I have often said “There is no justice outside of God.” However, living in Paraguay only a few years removed from dictatorship we are learning what that means.
    Until four years ago I taught my kids that if we were separated find a police officer and he will help you. That is not necessarily the case now. While most are good there is a huge portion that are not.
    We have had government entities change the “rules” on the fly to manipulate a fee all the while the standards are emblazoned on the wall next the cashier.
    There are many stories but this is your blog and I won’t hijack it in the comments.
    I am learning daily that HE is fair and just and does not forget me. I must put aside my perceived damages from the unfair acts and run the race…

    • http://www.thedailyretort.com/ TorConstantino

      Great thoughts Ken – I appreciate you sharing them here!

  • Donovan

    I really do not understand how evolution can be pressed into service either way. Since it is based on the competition of resources, it seems foolish to think that you could derive a sense of altruism from two sea gulls looking at one cracker on the beach. (queue the Finding Nemo seagulls)
    On the other hand, if evolution somehow did get me to this point by untold number of protozoa, then vertebrates, frogs perhaps, then ultimately primates saying, “no, I insist, after YOU!” Why am I compelled to give a crap either way? After all, I am here, dang the frogs and monkeys before me–I am gonna get my money’s worth for my YOLO tattoo.
    Seems to point to a greater scheme or schemer that painted lines on the road for us to observe. If so, then that is worth exploring. If not, then who cares if someone goes Sparta on their sibling for the last piece of cake? Preference, Pragmatism–why would it even be wrong?

    • http://www.thedailyretort.com/ TorConstantino

      Thanks for the comment and for catching the typo!